Grading+Rubric+for+the+Course

are not original, often confused and are not connected to discussions around scenario. || The ideas expressed are not necessarily original, and are not usually connected to discussions around education scenario. || The student expresses some original ideas. The majority of ideas are related to education scenario. || The student has many original ideas and expresses them clearly. The great majority of ideas are related to education or more specifically to scenario. || is well below course expectations. (at least 10 posts) || The post frequency is slightly below average. (at least 20 posts) || The post frequency is slightly above average. (at least 30 posts) || The post frequency greatly exceeds course expectations. (at least 40 posts) || poor quality. There is little to no evidence of reading other information in order to form new meaning of the topics and scenario at-hand. (less than a page, less than 400 words, total scenario) || Posts show a below average, overly casual writing style with a lack of attention to style. Students pay little attention to other reading and mostly regurgitate previous personal views. (1-2, more than 800 words, page scenario) || Posts show above average writing style. The content demonstrates that the student reads moderately, and attempts to synthesize information and form new meaning. ( 2-3 page, more than 1000 words, scenario) || Posts are well-written, and are characterized By elements of a strong writing style. The content demonstrates that the student is well read, synthesizes learned content and constructs new meaning. ( 3 pages or more, more than 1200 words, scenario) || evidence in any participation in the wiki community, or the course community, through the use of discussion. || Students rarely participated in the wiki community. Most, if not all, participation was limited to the discussion of other discussions classmates. || The student participated moderately in the wiki community. There was some evidence of out-of-class participation. || The student participated actively in the wiki community via comments on discussions, and citing others in their research and writing. || nothing to enhance or personalize the scenario or discussion/scenario space (No enhancements). || There is very little evidence of multimedia enhancement and the student discussion/scenario is primarily text-based (One enhancement). || The student enhanced their discussion/scenario to some extent using video, audio, images or other add-ons and/or links (Two enhancements). || The student greatly enhanced their discussion/scenario space using video, audio, images or other add-ons (Three or more enhancements). ||
 * Grading Rubric || 1 || 2 || 3 || 4 ||
 * Idea & Content || The ideas expressed
 * Post Frequency || The post frequency
 * Writing Quality || Posts are of very
 * Community || Students does not show
 * Use of Enhancements || The student did